Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 13 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from MUSE v. THE STATE (Three Cases).
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | MUSE v. THE STATE (Three Cases) Anchor | green | “this limited review leaves to the jury the resolution of conflicts in the evidence, the weight of the evidence, the credibility of witnesses, and reasonable inferences to be made from basic facts to ultimate facts.” | 8 |
| 2 | FITTS v. THE STATE (Two Cases) | green | “we review whether the evidence presented at trial, when viewed in the light most favorable to the jury's verdicts, enabled the jury to find the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of the crimes of which he was convicted.” | 3 |
| 3 | FITTS v. THE STATE (Two Cases) | green | “on appeal, a criminal defendant is no longer presumed innocent, and we review whether the evidence presented at trial, when viewed in the light most favorable to the jury's verdicts, enabled the jury to find the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of the crimes of which h…” | 2 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.