Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 12 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Hall v. Curran.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hall v. Curran Anchor | green | “by demonstrating that the individual is physically present in the state and has an intent to remain indefinitely.” | 3 |
| 2 | Bank One, Texas, N.A. v. Paul J. Montle | green | “in ordinary circumstances, all that is needed to change one's domicile is physical presence in the new state and the intent to make that state one's home.” | 3 |
| 3 | Chico v. Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority | green | “a person's domicile is the 'place where he has his true, fixed home and principal establishment, and to which, whenever he is absent, he has the intention of returning (animus revertendi).” | 3 |
| 4 | Chico v. Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority | green | “it is not required that the intention to stay there be permanent. . .” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.