Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 103 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Westfield Insurance Co. v. Tech Dry, Inc. Gayle Williamson.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Westfield Insurance Co. v. Tech Dry, Inc. Gayle Williamson Anchor | green | “must evaluate each motion on its own merits and view all facts and inferences in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party.” | 53 |
| 2 | Rosa Parks v. Laface Records | green | “the fact that the parties have filed cross-motions for summary judgment does not mean, of course, that summary judgment for one side or the other is necessarily appropriate.” | 45 |
| 3 | Westfield Insurance Co. v. Tech Dry, Inc. Gayle Williamson | green | “evaluate each motion on its own merits and view all facts and inferences in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party.” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.