Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 102 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from McNair v. Allen.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | McNair v. Allen Anchor | green | “all constitutional claims brought under 1983 are tort actions, subject to the statute of limitations governing personal injury actions in the state where the 1983 action has been brought.” | 42 |
| 2 | Brown v. Georgia Board of Pardons & Paroles | green | “the facts which would support a cause of action are apparent or should be apparent to a person with a reasonably prudent regard for his rights.” | 24 |
| 3 | Robert Lovett v. Walter S. Ray, Chairman, Georgia State Board of Pardons and Paroles | green | “federal law determines when the statute of limitations begins to run.” | 16 |
| 4 | Brown v. Georgia Board of Pardons & Paroles | green | “from the date 'the facts which would support a cause of action are apparent or should be apparent to a person with a reasonably prudent regard for his rights.” | 8 |
| 5 | Arsenio Leal v. Georgia Department of Corr. | green | “why the statute of limitations might be tolled in his case.” | 7 |
| 6 | Brown v. Georgia Board of Pardons & Paroles | green | “from the date the facts which would support a cause of action are apparent or should be apparent to a person with a reasonably prudent regard for his rights.” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.