Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 12 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Louise Cook v. Sheriff of Monroe County.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Louise Cook v. Sheriff of Monroe County Anchor | green | “testifying experts may not offer legal conclusions.” | 6 |
| 2 | Dennis Hurst and Joyce Hurst v. United States of America and Don Hight | green | “any weaknesses in the factual underpinnings of the expert's opinion go to the weight and credibility of his testimony, not to its admissibility.” | 6 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.