Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 12 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Gaynell Boyd v. Trustees of the United Mine Workers Health & Retirement Funds.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gaynell Boyd v. Trustees of the United Mine Workers Health & Retirement Funds Anchor | green | “full and final determination as to all issues concerning eligibility for benefits” | 8 |
| 2 | Nichols v. Eaton | green | “when trustees are in existence, and capable of acting, a court of equity will not interfere to control them in the exercise of a discretion vested in them by the instrument under which they act.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.