Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 12 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Florida Department of Revenue v. Piccadilly Cafeterias, Inc..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Florida Department of Revenue v. Piccadilly Cafeterias, Inc. Anchor | green | “a subchapter heading cannot substitute for the operative text of the statute.” | 5 |
| 2 | Six Companies of California v. Joint Highway District No. 13 | green | “statement of the ground of its decision” | 4 |
| 3 | Intercollegiate Broadcasting System, Inc. v. Copyright Royalty Board | green | “no power to render a final decision on behalf of the united states unless permitted to do so by other executive officers,” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.