Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 12 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Banks v. Chicago Grain Trimmers Assn., Inc..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Banks v. Chicago Grain Trimmers Assn., Inc. Anchor | green | “credit part of a witness' testimony without” | 3 |
| 2 | Ming Dai v. Jefferson Sessions | green | “in the absence of an explicit adverse credibility finding by the ij or the bia,” | 3 |
| 3 | Ming Dai v. William P. Barr | green | “must take as true an asylum applicant's testimony that supports a claim for asylum, even in the face of other testimony from the applicant that would under- mine an asylum claim.” | 3 |
| 4 | D-R | green | “the ij was not required to credit the respondent's wholesale denial of any knowledge or culpability” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.