Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 12 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from The New Jersey Coalition For Fair Broadcasting v. Federal Communications Commission.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | The New Jersey Coalition For Fair Broadcasting v. Federal Communications Commission Anchor | green | “arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, or otherwise not in accordance with law.” | 5 |
| 2 | Aarp v. Eeoc | green | “publishing or otherwise implementing the regulation at issue.” | 3 |
| 3 | Industrial Union Dept., AFL-CIO v. American Petroleum Institute | green | “a construction of the statute that avoids an open-ended grant of legislative authority should certainly be favored.” | 2 |
| 4 | Fertilizer Institute v. Browner | green | “announcing a principled reason” | 2 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.