Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 102 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Rakes v. United States.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Rakes v. United States Anchor | green | “offering evidence to disprove an element of the plaintiff's case or by demonstrating an 'absence of evidence to support the non-moving party's case.” | 40 |
| 2 | Mu v. Omni Hotels Management Corp. | green | “an issue is 'genuine' when a rational factfinder could resolve it either direction.” | 26 |
| 3 | Ellen Mendes v. Medtronic, Inc. | green | “the non-moving party bears the burden of placing at least one material fact into dispute.” | 20 |
| 4 | Pippins v. KPMG LLP | green | “whether an employee is exempt is determined by the employee's actual work activities, not by the employer's characterization of those activities through a job title or job description.” | 5 |
| 5 | Mu v. Omni Hotels Management Corp. | green | “a fact is 'material' when its (non)existence could change a case's outcome.” | 4 |
| 6 | Gattineri v. Wynn MA, LLC | green | “there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” | 4 |
| 7 | Marzuq v. Cadete Enterprises, Inc. | green | “pursuant to regulations issued by the secretary of labor, an employer seeking to establish that an employee is an exempted 'executive' must show: (1) the employee's salary is at least 455 per week, (2) the employee's 'primary duty' is management, (3) the employee 'customarily an…” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.