Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 12 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Lee v. City of Columbus, Ohio.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Lee v. City of Columbus, Ohio Anchor | green | “the standard of review for cross-motions for summary judgment does not differ from the standard applied when a motion is filed by only one party to the litigation.” | 8 |
| 2 | Salazar v. Brown | green | “the case turns upon an issue of law, such as the construction of a statute.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.