Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 12 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Citizens For Clean Air v. United States Environmental Protection Agency.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Citizens For Clean Air v. United States Environmental Protection Agency Anchor | green | “costs and benefits are too uncertain,” | 3 |
| 2 | Citizens For Clean Air v. United States Environmental Protection Agency | green | “it was 'unable to reliably quantify the emission reductions attributable to materials separation when a waste incinerator is equipped with highly efficient at-the-stack air pollution control devices.” | 3 |
| 3 | Competitive Enterprise Institute, and Consumer Alert v. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration | green | “arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, or otherwise not in accordance with law.” | 3 |
| 4 | Great Basin Mine Watch v. Hankins | green | “does not constitute a 'hard look' at the environmental consequences of the action as required by nepa.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.