Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 12 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Maynor v. Heckler.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Maynor v. Heckler Anchor | green | “is not permitted to re-weigh the evidence and reach its own determination.” | 5 |
| 2 | Lane-Rauth v. Barnhart | green | “has analyzed all evidence and has sufficiently explained the weight he has given to obviously probative exhibits.” | 4 |
| 3 | Jones v. Astrue | green | “in reviewing an ssa decision, 'the findings of the commissioner of social security as to any fact, if supported by substantial evidence, shall be conclusive.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.