Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 12 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Ronald Maynard v. Larry Meachum.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ronald Maynard v. Larry Meachum Anchor | green | “that there are technical rules governing the conduct of a trial, and that presenting a defense is not a simple matter of telling one's story,” | 3 |
| 2 | United States v. John L. Harris | green | “would have consisted of scrutinizing a standard cja application and affidavit disclosing beverly's financial status, and (2) that such an inquiry would not have been” | 3 |
| 3 | United States v. Darrell G. Hafen | green | “although the process of review would be simplified if the district court would engage in a more extended colloquy and give a more specific warning than was done here, and if it would” | 3 |
| 4 | United States v. Darrell G. Hafen | green | “issue a particular warning or make specific findings of fact before it allows a defendant to proceed pro se.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.