Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 12 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from N&n Contractors, Incorporated v. Occupational Safety & Health Review Commission Alexis M. Herman, Secretary of Labor.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | N&n Contractors, Incorporated v. Occupational Safety & Health Review Commission Alexis M. Herman, Secretary of Labor Anchor | green | “explained that, in establishing an exposure to a hazard under 29 c.f.r. 1926.501 (b)(1), osha must show a reasonable predictability that the employees either were, or would be, in the” | 4 |
| 2 | Law Offices of Barry Levinson, P.C. v. Milko | green | “an arbitrary and capricious abuse of discretion.” | 4 |
| 3 | I. Cox Construction Co. v. CH2 Investments, LLC | green | “construe the statute according to its fair meaning and so as not to produce unreasonable results.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.