Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 12 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from United States v. Patrick James McMannus United States of America v. Sheri Brinton.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United States v. Patrick James McMannus United States of America v. Sheri Brinton Anchor | green | “the farther the district court varies from the presumptively reasonable guidelines range, the more compelling the justification based on the 3553(a) factors must be.” | 8 |
| 2 | United States v. Kendall Myron Robinson | green | “there may well be cases that would not justify a departure under the guidelines but which are appropriate for a variance.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.