Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 12 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from United States v. Goines.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United States v. Goines Anchor | green | “ruled with the proverbial iron fist through intimidation.” | 3 |
| 2 | United States v. Danny Harmon | green | “his guidelines range was the same-360 months to life- whether he was in criminal history category i or ii” | 3 |
| 3 | United States v. Demond Glover | green | “had the district court relied on the career offender status when choosing the appropriate sentence, the error would not have been harm- less even though the guideline range would have been the same.” | 3 |
| 4 | United States v. Demond Glover | green | “since the parties do not dispute the error, we need only address whether the error is harmless.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.