Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 12 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from In Re the Guardianship & Conservatorship of Anderson.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | In Re the Guardianship & Conservatorship of Anderson Anchor | neutral | “the meaning of interested person as it relates to particular persons may vary from time to time and must be determined according to the particular purposes of and matter involved in any proceeding.” | 4 |
| 2 | Estate of Bartelson | green | “person interested in the estate” | 4 |
| 3 | Dewey v. Stringer | green | “will not reverse a district court when it reaches the right result, even if it reached that result for the wrong reason” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.