Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 12 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Charles H. Keating, Jr. v. Office of Thrift Supervision.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Charles H. Keating, Jr. v. Office of Thrift Supervision Anchor | green | “the constitution does not ordinarily require a stay of civil proceedings pending the outcome of criminal proceedings.” | 8 |
| 2 | Keating v. Office of Thrift Supervision | green | “the decision whether to stay civil proceedings in the face of a parallel criminal proceeding should be made 'in light of the particular circumstances and competing interests involved in the case.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.