Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 12 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Brian Ahearn v. Charter Township Of Bloomfield.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Brian Ahearn v. Charter Township Of Bloomfield Anchor | green | “due regard for state governments' rightful independence requires federal courts scrupulously to confine their own jurisdiction to precise statutory limits.” | 5 |
| 2 | Schmidt v. Ass'n of Apartment Owners of Marco Polo Condominium | green | “the majority view is that the determination of who is a defendant is determined by the original complaint, not subsequent third or fourth-party complaints.” | 4 |
| 3 | Johnston v. St. Paul Fire and Marine Ins. Co. | green | “the majority view is that third-party defendants may not remove under 1441(a).” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.