Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 12 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Heriberto Baldayaque v. United States.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Heriberto Baldayaque v. United States Anchor | green | “the standard is not 'extreme diligence' or 'exceptional diligence,' it is reasonable diligence.” | 5 |
| 2 | Bernardo A. Torres v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of Social Security | green | “the failure of a retained attorney to timely file a federal social security complaint does not necessarily constitute an 'extraordinary circumstance' warranting equitable tolling.” | 4 |
| 3 | Cole-Hill ex rel. T.W. v. Colvin | green | “application of the doctrine of equitable tolling is appropriate only in rare and exceptional circumstances in which a party is prevented in some extraordinary way from exercising his rights.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.