Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 12 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Johnson v. Mbna America Bank.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Johnson v. Mbna America Bank Anchor | green | “to give consumers a means to dispute - and, ultimately, correct - inaccurate information on their credit reports,” | 3 |
| 2 | Evelyn Bodett, Wife David Bodett, Husband v. Coxcom, Inc., a Delaware Corporation | green | “that no genuine disputes of material fact exist and that the district court correctly applied the law.” | 3 |
| 3 | Dirk Westra v. Credit Control of Pinellas | green | “when only one conclusion about the conduct's reasonableness is possible.” | 3 |
| 4 | Francis v. Dun & Bradstreet, Inc. | green | “with malice or willful intent to injure the consumer.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.