Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 12 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Ali J. Iysheh v. Alberto R. Gonzales.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ali J. Iysheh v. Alberto R. Gonzales Anchor | green | “the plea agreement, the superseding indictment, and the judgment order” | 3 |
| 2 | Khan v. Mukasey | green | “has no liberty or property interest in the relief he seeks,” | 3 |
| 3 | COTA | green | “no discernible basis in the language of the ina” | 3 |
| 4 | ROLDAN | green | “the original finding or confession of guilt is sufficient to establish a 'conviction' for purposes of the immigration laws.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.