Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 12 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Siroky v. Richland County.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Siroky v. Richland County Anchor | green | “interest earned belongs to the owner of the funds that generated the interest” | 3 |
| 2 | Pomona City School District v. Payne | green | “obviously the interest accretions belong to such owner” | 3 |
| 3 | B & M Coal Corp. v. United Mine Workers of America | green | “interest earnings must follow the principal and be distributed to the ultimate owners of the fund” | 3 |
| 4 | School District v. City of Pontiac | green | “the generally understood and applied principles that interest is merely an incident of the principal and must be accounted for” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.