Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 12 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from State Ex Rel. Office of the State Public Defender v. Court of Appeals.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | State Ex Rel. Office of the State Public Defender v. Court of Appeals Anchor | green | “as the court of original jurisdiction, we have discretion to issue a supervisory writ.” | 3 |
| 2 | Department of Natural Resources v. Wisconsin Court of Appeals, District IV | green | “(1) an appeal is an inadequate remedy; (2) grave hardship or irreparable harm will result; (3) the duty of the trial court is plain and it . . . acted or intends to act in violation of that duty; and (4) the request for relief is made promptly and speedily.” | 3 |
| 3 | Department of Natural Resources v. Wisconsin Court of Appeals, District IV | green | “a supervisory writ is 'an extraordinary and drastic remedy that is 8 no. 2022ap1736-w to be issued only upon some grievous exigency.” | 3 |
| 4 | Department of Natural Resources v. Wisconsin Court of Appeals, District IV | green | “losing the right with no means to recover it makes the harm irreparable.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.