Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 12 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Estate of Dykes v. Estate of Williams.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Estate of Dykes v. Estate of Williams Anchor | green | “if there is substantial evidence to support the chancellor's findings of fact, those findings must be affirmed.” | 6 |
| 2 | In Re Conservatorship of Bardwell | green | “if there is substantial evidence to support the chancellor's findings of fact, those findings must be affirmed.” | 3 |
| 3 | Estate of Dykes v. Estate of Williams | green | “we will not disturb the factual findings of a chancellor unless such findings are manifestly wrong or clearly erroneous.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.