Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 12 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Musollari v. Mukasey.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Musollari v. Mukasey Anchor | green | “show that he will be singled out for persecution or that a group to which the applicant belongs is subject to a pattern or practice of persecution.” | 3 |
| 2 | Kholyavskiy v. Mukasey | green | “eligibility for asylum 'is a factual determination which we review under the substantial evidence test.” | 3 |
| 3 | Chakir, Rachid v. Gonzales, Alberto | green | “generally, an alien is required to raise and exhaust his remedies before the bia as to each claim or ground for relief to preserve his right to judicial review of that claim.” | 3 |
| 4 | Ahmed, Nuradin v. Gonzales, Alberto | green | “show that there is a reasonable possibility that he will suffer persecution if he is returned” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.