Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 12 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Matter of Estate of Pate.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Matter of Estate of Pate Anchor | green | “determine all issues of fact and law . . . and enter an order or judgment, as appropriate, containing findings of fact and conclusions of law supporting the order or judgment.” | 4 |
| 2 | Matter of Estate of Pate | green | “the standard of review in the court of appeals is the same as in the superior court.” | 4 |
| 3 | Matter of Estate of Swinson | green | “the superior court may review any of the clerk's findings of fact when the finding is properly challenged by specific exception and may thereupon either affirm, modify or reverse the challenged findings.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.