Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 12 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Wright v. Alexandria Division of Social Services.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Wright v. Alexandria Division of Social Services Anchor | green | “when a state infringes upon a parent's constitutional right to the companionship of his or her child in order to protect the child from abuse and neglect, it must satisfy the mandates of procedural due process.” | 4 |
| 2 | Mayo v. Department of Commerce | green | “necessary for the orderly, fair and expeditious administration of justice.” | 3 |
| 3 | King v. International Harvester Co. | green | “demeanor, appearance, candor and behavior on the witness stand” | 3 |
| 4 | Mayo v. Department of Commerce | green | “compliance with them is necessary for the orderly, fair and expeditious administration of justice.” | 2 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.