Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 12 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Collins v. Lombard Corp..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Collins v. Lombard Corp. Anchor | green | “a case is moot when its resolution would amount to the determination of an abstract question not arising upon existing facts or rights.” | 4 |
| 2 | In re M. F. | green | “it is the duty of this court to raise the question of its jurisdiction in all cases in which there may be any doubt as to the existence of such jurisdiction.” | 3 |
| 3 | In re M. F. | green | “we have recognized circumstances where cases that may appear to be moot are nonetheless viable due to the particular nature of the litigated issue.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.