Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 12 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Burchette v. Commonwealth.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Burchette v. Commonwealth Anchor | green | “ownership or occupancy alone is insufficient to prove knowing possession of contraband located on the premises or in a vehicle,” | 7 |
| 2 | Donald Keith Epps v. Commonwealth of Virginia | green | “will not be set aside unless it appears from the evidence that the judgment is plainly wrong or without evidence to support it.” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.