Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 12 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Gibson v. Gibson.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gibson v. Gibson Anchor | green | “in reviewing a bench trial, we view the evidence in the light most favorable to the trial court's rulings, defer to the trial court's credibility judgments, and will not set aside the trial court's factual findings unless they are clearly erroneous.” | 9 |
| 2 | Brooks-Powers v. Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority | green | “we owe no deference to a trial court's ruling on questions of law and review such issues de novo.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.