Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 12 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Smith v. COUNTRY VILLAGE INTERNATIONAL, INC..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Smith v. COUNTRY VILLAGE INTERNATIONAL, INC. Anchor | green | “failure to prove damages is fatal to a claim for breach of contract.” | 5 |
| 2 | Winey v. William E. Dailey, Inc. | green | “we have cautioned against confusing principles of contract with principles of fraud so that the elements of fraud are made out by a mere breach of contract.” | 4 |
| 3 | Winey v. William E. Dailey, Inc. | green | “confusing principles of contract with principles of fraud so that the elements of fraud are made out by a mere breach of contract” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.