Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 12 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from City of New York v. Permanent Mission of India to the United Nations.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | City of New York v. Permanent Mission of India to the United Nations Anchor | green | “the tax status of the consular portions of the premises is controlled by article 32 of the vienna convention on consular relations” | 3 |
| 2 | United States v. Coplon | green | “no person shall, by reason of the provisions of this title, be considered as receiving diplomatic status other than such as are specifically set forth herein” | 3 |
| 3 | Harrison v. Commissioner | green | “resident aliens, like other individual taxpayers, must include compensation for services, such as wages, in their gross income.” | 3 |
| 4 | Ying v. Commissioner | green | “became ineligible for the benefits under section 893 when he filed his waiver under section 247(b) of the immigration and nationality act” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.