Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 12 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from People v. Denbo.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | People v. Denbo Anchor | green | “passively force someone to continue with the sex act by using one's bodily inertia to prevent the victim from disengaging.” | 3 |
| 2 | People v. Foley | green | “in a case involving sexual penetration, the specific type of penetration is not an element of the offense.” | 3 |
| 3 | People v. Bolton | green | “there is no definite standard establishing the amount of force which the state is required to prove in order to prove criminal sexual assault, and each case must be considered on its own facts.” | 3 |
| 4 | People v. Harper | green | “in a case involving sexual penetration, the specific type of penetration is not an element of the offense.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.