Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 12 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Anderson v. Westfield Group.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Anderson v. Westfield Group Anchor | green | “subsequent injury, whether in the form of an aggravation of the original injury or a new and distinct injury, is compensable if it is the 'direct and natural result' of a compensable injury.” | 4 |
| 2 | Anderson v. Westfield Group | green | “the rationale for the rule is that the original compensable injury is deemed the cause of the damage flowing from the subsequent injury-producing event.” | 4 |
| 3 | Rogers v. Shaw | green | “the rule, commonly referred to as the direct and natural consequences rule, has been stated as: when the primary injury is shown to have arisen out of and in the course of employment, every natural consequence that flows from the injury likewise arises out of the employment.” | 2 |
| 4 | Rogers v. Shaw | green | “when the primary injury is shown to have arisen out of and in the course of employment, every natural consequence that flows from the injury likewise arises out of the employment.” | 2 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.