Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 12 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from in the Interest of S.M.R., G.J.R. and C.N.R., Children.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | in the Interest of S.M.R., G.J.R. and C.N.R., Children Anchor | green | “clear and convincing evidence' means the measure or degree of proof that will produce in the mind of the trier of fact a firm belief or conviction as to the truth of the allegations sought to be established.” | 6 |
| 2 | Hann v. Texas Department of Protective & Regulatory Services | green | “establishing a stable, permanent home for a child is a compelling interest for the government” | 3 |
| 3 | Crystal Spurck v. Texas Department of Family and Protective Services | green | “while no one factor is controlling, the analysis of a single factor may be adequate in a particular situation to support a finding that termination is in the child's best interest.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.