Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 12 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from City of Chicago v. Pooh Bah Enterprises, Inc..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | City of Chicago v. Pooh Bah Enterprises, Inc. Anchor | green | “a statute can be impermissibly vague for either of two independent reasons: (1) if it fails to provide people of ordinary intelligence a reasonable opportunity to understand what conduct it prohibits, or (2) if it authorizes or even encourages arbitrary and discriminatory enforc…” | 3 |
| 2 | VELOCITY INVESTMENTS, LLC v. Alston | green | “entitled to have issues clearly defined with pertinent authority cited and cohesive arguments presented.” | 3 |
| 3 | People v. Taylor | green | “impermissibly vague in all of its applications.” | 3 |
| 4 | Wilson v. County of Cook | green | “impossibility of compliance means the act provides no standard of conduct at all.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.