Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 99 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Kathryn C. Rollins v. Larry G. Massanari, Acting Commissioner of Social Security Administration.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Kathryn C. Rollins v. Larry G. Massanari, Acting Commissioner of Social Security Administration Anchor | green | “relevant factor in determining the severity of the claimant's” | 38 |
| 2 | Berry v. Astrue | green | “will not reject your statements about the intensity and persistence of your pain or other symptoms or about the effect your symptoms have on your ability to work solely because the available objective medical evidence does not substantiate your statements” | 33 |
| 3 | Kathryn C. Rollins v. Larry G. Massanari, Acting Commissioner of Social Security Administration | green | “while subjective pain testimony cannot be rejected on the sole ground that it is not fully corroborated by objective medical evidence, the medical evidence is still a relevant factor in determining the severity of the claimant's pain and its disabling effects.” | 28 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.