Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 12 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from People v. Rivera.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | People v. Rivera Anchor | green | “the manner and circumstances of the touching that occurred,” | 3 |
| 2 | People v. Gaston | green | “the victim onto a deserted floor in a large building where she was” | 3 |
| 3 | Jeffrey v. Koehler | neutral | “could not have been altered in any substantial way” | 3 |
| 4 | Uht v. Hazan & Sawyer Environmental Engineers & Scientists | green | “misconduct of the spectator in open court and the court's responsibility to maintain order” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.