Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 12 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Perkins v. Perkins.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Perkins v. Perkins Anchor | green | “a sharp departure from reasonableness must be demonstrated before our intercession can be expected.” | 5 |
| 2 | Valentino v. Valentino | green | “mistakenly exercised its broad authority to divide the parties' property and whether the result was 'reached by the trial judge on the evidence, or whether it is clearly unfair or unjustly distorted by a misconception of law or findings of fact that are contrary to the evidence.” | 4 |
| 3 | Wadlow v. Wadlow | green | “a sharp departure from reasonableness must be demonstrated before our intercession can be expected.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.