2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 8 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Consolidated Rail Corporation v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Consolidated Rail Corporation v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn. Anchor | green | “the distinguishing feature of is that the dispute may be conclusively resolved by interpreting the existing” | 4 |
| 2 | Pittsburgh & Lake Erie Railroad v. Railway Labor Executives' Ass'n | green | “minor disputes are those involving the interpretation or application of existing contracts.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.