Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 12 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Summers v. A. L. Gilbert Co..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Summers v. A. L. Gilbert Co. Anchor | green | “there are limits to expert testimony, not the least of which is the prohibition against admission of an expert's opinion on a question of law.” | 5 |
| 2 | Californians for Political Reform Foundation v. Fair Political Practices Commission | green | “a material portion of the statute” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.