2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 8 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Stenberg v. Carhart.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Stenberg v. Carhart Anchor | green | “since the law requires a health exception in order to validate even a postviability abortion regulation, it at a minimum requires the same in respect to previability regulation.” | 5 |
| 2 | Richmond Medical Center For Women v. Hicks | green | “even if we assumed without deciding that the district court abused its discretion in excluding the commonwealth's opinion evidence, the consideration of that evidence would not change our result.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.