Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 12 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from J.C.B. v. Pennsylvania State Police.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | J.C.B. v. Pennsylvania State Police Anchor | green | “the trial court, as the fact finder, acted within its discretion in,” | 5 |
| 2 | Hirsch v. EPL Technologies, Inc. | green | “as long as sufficient evidence exists in the record to support the finding found by the trial court, as factfinder, we are precluded from overturning that finding and must affirm, thereby paying the proper deference due to the factfinder who heard the witnesses testify and was i…” | 4 |
| 3 | E.G.G., Jr. v. Pennsylvania State Police | green | “is not merely an error in judgment . . . it occurs when the law is overridden or misapplied, or the judgment exercised is manifestly unreasonable, or the result of partiality, prejudice, bias, or ill-will, as shown by the evidence on record.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.