Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 7 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Dolgaleva v. Virginia Beach City Public Schools.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Dolgaleva v. Virginia Beach City Public Schools Anchor | green | “test the sufficiency of the complaint to see if it alleges a claim for which relief can be granted.” | 4 |
| 2 | Diana Houck v. Substitute Trustee Services | green | “a plaintiff need not demonstrate ... that alternative explanations are less likely” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.