Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 12 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from People v. Spoto.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | People v. Spoto Anchor | green | “independent of the intermediate inference, prohibited by cre 404(b), that the defendant has a bad character” | 6 |
| 2 | People v. Sommers | green | “no prosecutorial misconduct upon which a claim of plain error can be based.” | 3 |
| 3 | People v. Sommers | green | “while prosecutors may challenge defense experts' biases, methods, and conclusions, they may not resort to unfairly” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.