Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 12 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from St. Onge v. Donovan.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | St. Onge v. Donovan Anchor | green | “conditions imposed to protect the surrounding area from a particular land use are consistent with the purposes of zoning, which seeks to harmonize the various land uses within a community” | 3 |
| 2 | Old Country Burgers Co. v. Town Board of Oyster Bay | green | “it is well settled that a zoning board may impose appropriate conditions and safeguards in conjunction with a grant of a special permit” | 3 |
| 3 | Norse Energy Corp. USA v. Town of Dryden | green | “regulate the use of land through the enactment of zoning laws” | 3 |
| 4 | Woodbury Heights Estates Water Co. v. Village of Woodbury | neutral | “includes all surface and underground water within the state's territorial limits” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.