Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 12 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Krysty v. State University.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Krysty v. State University Anchor | green | “substantially adhered to its grievance procedures and that its determination is neither arbitrary nor capricious” | 3 |
| 2 | Boyd v. State University | green | “in a disciplinary proceeding at a public institution of higher education, due process entitles a student accused of misconduct to a statement detailing the factual findings and the evidence relied upon by the decision-maker in reaching the determination of guilt” | 3 |
| 3 | Rensselaer Society of Engineers v. Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute | green | “is limited to determining whether the university substantially adhered to its own published rules and guidelines for disciplinary proceedings so as to ascertain whether its actions were arbitrary or capricious” | 3 |
| 4 | Rensselaer Society of Engineers v. Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute | green | “judicial scrutiny of the determination of disciplinary matters between a university and its students, or student organizations, is limited to determining whether the university substantially adhered to its own published rules and guidelines for disciplinary proceedings so as to …” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.