Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 98 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Ex Parte Integon Corp..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ex Parte Integon Corp. Anchor | green | “mandamus is a drastic and extraordinary writ, to be issued only where there is (1) a clear legal right in the petitioner to the order sought; (2) an imperative duty upon the respondent to perform, accompanied by a refusal to do so; (3) the lack of another adequate remedy; and (4…” | 84 |
| 2 | Ex Parte Integon Corp. | green | “when we consider a mandamus petition relating to a venue ruling, our scope of review is to determine if the trial court exceeded its discretion, i.e., whether it exercised its discretion in an arbitrary and capricious manner.” | 10 |
| 3 | Ex Parte CTB, Inc. | green | “the proper method for obtaining review of a denial of a motion for a change of venue in a civil action is to petition for the writ of mandamus.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.